8. Conflict, Politics and ExchangeThis is a featured page

Summary
In this chapter, the author shows us how the Ju/hoansi lived relatively peacefully with each other, through various ways such as territorial ownership and leadership, nature of conflict and resolution, and a form of gift exchange which served to maintain harmonious relations among the Ju/’hoansi.

The Ju/'hoansi have an egalitarian society, which has no headmen. Territories, or n!ores, are not owned by individuals. Rather, they are owned by groups of people, known as k"ausi. While the Ju living groups have leaders who may establish substantial influence in decision making, they have no formal power. The usage of n!ores is governed by a principle of reciprocity, which ensures fairness in the usage of resources belonging to different n!ores, hence greatly reducing the possibility of territorial conflicts. All that a Ju/'hoan has to do when shifting from one n!ore to another was to seek permission from the k"ausi, which was very often granted.

Next, the author went on to describe the various types of conflict among the Ju/’hoansi. There are three levels of conflict, namely, talking, fighting, and deadly fighting. Talking involves threats and verbal abuse without getting physical. Fighting involves the exchange of blows without the use of weapons. Deadly fighting involves the use of fatal weapons such as poisoned arrows, spears, and clubs. The poisoned arrows used in deadly fights are those that they use in hunting, which can kill a two-hundred-kilogram animal within a day.

Disputes often involve issues such as improper meat distribution, improper hxaro gift exchange, and laziness or stinginess. They usually begin as good-natured conversations filled in with laughter, although the seriousness of the issues is still present. Subsequently when real anger sinks in, the conversation develops into a “talk”, or n≠wa. The n≠wa may develop into a severe argument involving sexual abuse or za. The za can be said to be the most severe form of assault verbally, beyond which, physical assault takes place. It often leads directly to a fight.

Fighting takes the form of hand-to-hand combat involving wrestling and hitting at close quarters rather than fisticuffs. Each fight tends to last between two to five minutes. Fights do not just occur between members of the same gender. They can involve both men and women. However, fights usually occur between men over women. Fights usually end with the parties involved joking with each other, followed by separation of the parties to sort out their feelings before coming back together again, which is known as group fission. Third parties may either be breaking the fighting parties up or egging them on. In all fights, men between twenty and fifty years old are, as much as possible, kept apart as they own lethal poisoned arrows.

The use of talking, joking and group fission to separate parties in conflict has thus helped to prevent the escalation of violence, which ultimately maintains harmony in the communities.

Unfortunately, fights that end fatally still occur. The author illustrated a case of deadly fighting to highlight some general features of arrow fights. Firstly, the main parties involved belong to closely related living groups. Secondly, they often implicate those not involved in the original dispute. Thirdly, they intensify swiftly. Fourthly, the results are unforeseeable. Lastly, it almost always happens only between males. The poisoned arrows used in deadly fights are those that they use in hunting, which can kill a two-hundred-kilogram animal within a day. Poisoned arrows are used because those involved in deadly fights have the intention to kill rather than just to wound.

When one killing has happened, another usually ensues, in revenge, resulting in a thread of killings. This poses a problem as the Ju/’hoansi have no formal authority to stop the string of violence once it has started. Nevertheless, they resolve it by some form of execution whereby members from the victim’s side publicly kill the perpetrators without resistance by the community.

Under the influence of outsiders, the Ju/’hoansi has established a court to handle disputes so as to prevent them from developing into violent fights. The court grew to become very popular with the Ju/’hoansi as it eases their burden of settling disputes among themselves which could lead to serious bloodshed, and also because it protects the Ju/’hoansi from the Black settlers. Unfortunately, despite its popularity, homicide cases still happened.

Lastly, it is the Ju/’hoan system of gift exchange, known as hxaro, that contributes most to maintaining harmony within the Ju/’hoansi. The gift exchange does not have to occur at the same time and need not be of the same value. The focus of it is to build social relations, and it is the difference in the time of exchange and the value of the gift that enables the maintenance of social relations. In the long-run, the value of the goods exchanged has to balance out, thus keeping them looking forward to the next exchange. Hxaro may occur between any two people of any age and gender, although it usually happens between married couples. They may use` any item of their own material culture, although items of European origin have been distinctly popular. Both food and people should not be used in hxaro. Hxaro occurs more intensely during major gatherings when people who have not met in a long time would close their past transactions and begin new ones. Despite the mechanics involved, the Ju/’hoansi do lose interest in maintaining relationships, often resulting in arguments and conflicts.

The hxaro, in addition, contributes to maintaining ecological balance and ensuring that the Ju/’hoansi have sufficient food in each season. When the supply of food becomes scarce in an area, they look for other areas to shift to. Through kin ties maintained by hxaro, they are able to shift to where those kins are living, where there is sufficient food.



Commentaries
This chapter demonstrates that for the Dobe Ju/’hoansi, organizational structure is constructed by the people themselves with regards to how they deal with politics, conflict and social relations. Thus, it debunks the idea that there is no structure governing the society. More importantly, it shows that even in a society where there are little or no economic or political tensions, there are still conflicts and violence surfacing. This may suggest that social relationships and interaction form the basis of conflicts and violence. For the Dobe Ju/’hoansi, marital relations or intimate relationships are the primary factor for conflict and violence in their society. For this matter, it may be suggested that due to the structure of Ju/’hoan society as communal, close-knit and primarily based on kinship ties, marital and social relations are of priority and importance. In the case of adultery triggering conflict and violence, it may be seen as having a role or function in disturbing the social fabric of Ju/’hoan society on which social relations are based. Ownership and leadership in Ju/’hoan society is thus based on social relations and reciprocity of such relations. For instance, marriage increases the number of n!ores owned by people due to the kinship and social ties.

They have different ways of dealing with conflicts and violence, through mechanisms such as hxaro gift exchanges, group efforts, the court and leaders in groups. In Ju/’hoan society, there is no apparent demarcation of class or hierarchy. There is the denial of a headman and this is mostly due to the nature of their lifestyle which tends towards nomadic form. However, there are leaders in groups who influence decisions subtly. Due to the absence of a headman or a political authority, there is the appropriation of a court by the Tswana and Herero to settle serious disputes. In looking at the efficiency of the kgotla ‘court’ in settling such disputes, it is rather surprising to note that the intervention of a court heightens conflict and violence most of the time, which may point to the awareness of how the Ju/’hoan society works. They may work better as a community, or in groups in settling conflict and violence. For instance, they may resolve conflict through joking or physical separation. On the other hand, the Ju/’hoan group may also appropriates itself as a state and settle disputes on their own and mostly based on their own reasoning in retaliation of fights that had occurred previously. Thus, in the Ju/’hoan society, even though it seems that there is chaos and lack of order as there are no apparent organizational structures, it is important to note that for the Dobe Ju/’hoansi, there are distinct sets of roles assumed by the Dobe Ju/'hoansi through the appropriation of the state and court for group and social solidarity. In the chapter, it is mentioned that they are all headmen themselves.

The hxaro gift exchange is an important mechanism for maintaining social relations, group solidarity and minimizing conflict and violence through long-term non-equivalent gift-giving. The hxaro gift exchange is primarily about social relations and ties as these are seen as important for the Ju/’hoan society. As the Dobe Ju/’hoansi move and settle in different places at different times, it is important to maintain social contact with people for the ecological balance of their physical environment they live in. Also, the idea of sharing reinforces itself through hxaro gift exchange and emphasizes the sharing of resources due to the limited availability and lifespan of resources. Thus, the idea of wealth is measured by the number of social relations one have and not the accumulation of capital. The amount of social relations one has can also be attributed to one's social status in Ju/'hoan society. Sharing is seen to be encouraged in the Ju/’hoan society, particularly as sharing improves the welfare of the society as a whole and redistributes resources such that people can have enough for sustenance. The hxaro gift exchange also has a cultural and structural aspect to it. In most hxaro gift exchanges, beadwork is exchanged and the intricacy of beadwork gradually becomes an art form. This illustrates the traditions and culture of the Dobe Ju/’hoansi which can be passed on through hxaro gift exchanges, which then fosters social relations and strengthens the social fabric. Culture, tradition and social relations are then reaffirmed. The hxaro gift exchange system can be seen as a social system that is distinct from the kinship system and the marriage system in Ju/’hoan society, and there are different ‘rules’ constructed for different types of systems in Ju/’hoan society.



ocean_breeze
ocean_breeze
Latest page update: made by ocean_breeze , Oct 4 2011, 8:50 AM EDT (about this update About This Update ocean_breeze Edited by ocean_breeze

759 words added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: Dobe Ju/'hoansi Lee San
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
Ahtan Birthday Presents vs Hxaro Gifts 0 Oct 8 2010, 4:37 AM EDT by Ahtan
Thread started: Oct 8 2010, 4:37 AM EDT  Watch
(Tutorial Participation)

In our society today, perhaps the only form of gift exchange that we do practice is in the form of Birthday celebrations and presents.

I am particular intrigued by one of the common practices for buying a Birthday present for a friend. That would be the act of gathering a group of people, getting them each to contribute some money and pooling together this money to buy the present. (And I also realise, from my own experience that there is a “minimum” cost to the gift that you are giving to the birthday person and that cost depends on the number of people sharing). I am not saying it is not wrong to buy expensive gifts for friends on their Birthdays, especially on 21st Birthdays etc. Either is it wrong to share money to buy the expensive present (most of us are students so we cannot afford expensive gifts on our own anyway). But it seems true that one of the factors that we will consider when giving or receiving a present during Birthdays is the cost of it. But just like the Ju/’hoansi, we also expect the person to return a present to us on our Birthday. The Ju/’hoansi view their gift exchange as a way of maintain ties and long distance relationship. For us, Birthday presents represent our friendship with the other person as well.

It seems like we do practice some form of “Haxro exchange” in our society as well; perhaps just in a more materialistic and expensive manner. But just as the importance of Haxro exchange is to maintain relationship; Birthday gifts and celebrations also represent our friendship for each other.

And I believe there are still cases where people do look beyond the cost of a gift. There are still some of us who prefer handmade gifts over gifts that can be bought at gift shops. =)
4  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: Dobe Ju/'hoansi Lee San
michh. conflict management- my 2 cents worth 3 Oct 5 2008, 4:01 PM EDT by yen teng
Thread started: Sep 30 2008, 3:54 AM EDT  Watch
I think the Ju's manner of conflict management is particularly interesting and bears certain noteworthy similarities to our society. Though, for us, disagreements among peers rarely degenerate into physical violence (given the harshness of our system of social sanctions), disagreements and inter-personal conflicts do follow similar patterns in terms of 'degree'.

The most common form of 'confrontation' we experience is similar to the Ju's 'talking' conflicts. Instances of this include the good-natured trading of insults or the use of sarcasm amongst peers. While these, like that of the Ju, do not include any form of physical violence, this manner of confrontation is more subtle and normally used as an indirect means of expressing the displeasure with the other party.

We rarely 'fight' in the manner of the Ju. Instead, our 'fighting' is carried out in a largely verbal sense - in head-on confrontations with peers or friends which feature insults, loud arguments and the like. These conflicts do not wreak 'irreparable' damage on our relationships as they may return to normal following a period of 'cooling off' or mediation by a third party. ''Deadly conflicts' however, usually result in the cessation of social relations between the two parties due to its severity or even the degeneration into physical violence.

Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
Show Last Reply
zurah Hxaro exchange vs Prostitution as a marketplace 0 Oct 5 2008, 4:41 AM EDT by zurah
Thread started: Oct 5 2008, 4:41 AM EDT  Watch
It can't be denied that living in the world today, money is one of the most important thing to us. With the rising prices of practically everything, people are now pursuing money in various ways. Price tags are attached to everything. Even humans.

As compared to the Hxaro exchange whereby the Ju place importance on human relationships rather than the value of thier gifts exchanges, I think our society do not so much care about relationships. It's always the desires and money.

Take prostitution for instance. Yes, this is based heavily on social exchange. But not in terms of strengthening relationships like in Hxaro exchange.It's in terms of sexual economics. In this article I once read, it explained that men and women negotiate with each other sexually in a “marketplace” in the context of a cultural system whereby the women are the “sellers” and the men are the “buyers”.

Social exchange theory is used to explain the interactions between the two sexes whereby each negotiates to maximize their gains and minimize their losses. Ironically, i think sexual intercourse itself is not an equal exchange. Despite it being important for both parties to gain what they want, sex as a female resource has put females at a losing side as their sexuality is of a higher value than that to males. Isn't that true? You cant place a price to virginity. Even though prostitutions allow these activities to be carried out and negotiations take place, it is demeaning to learn that sex, which is of something pure and seen as creator of life, becomes cheap sex.

Anyway, you can see the negotiations and the idea of "trading with people" taking place behind the scenes. well, this is an example of many other exchanges that you can see in our society.Mostly it's just for money.

0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None
Showing 3 of 5 threads for this page - view all

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on WikiFoundry Central.)